Home > Journals > Minerva Dental and Oral Science > Past Issues > Articles online first > Minerva Dental and Oral Science 2025 Mar 25

CURRENT ISSUE
 

JOURNAL TOOLS

Publishing options
eTOC
To subscribe
Submit an article
Recommend to your librarian
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Publication history
Reprints
Permissions
Cite this article as
Share

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE   

Minerva Dental and Oral Science 2025 Mar 25

DOI: 10.23736/S2724-6329.25.04940-X

Copyright © 2025 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Survival of dental restorations performed under general anesthesia in special needs patients. Report from a 15-year experience

Simone BUTTIGLIERI 1, Francesco DELLA FERRERA 1 , Massimo OLMI 1, Andrea RICOTTI 2, Paolo APPENDINO 1

1 Department of Dentistry, AO Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy; 2 Clinical Trial Unit, AO Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy


PDF


BACKGROUND: Longevity of dental restorations (DR) in the general population is well discussed in the literature. Evaluation of survival of DR in special needs patients (SNP) is less frequently reported especially in long-term. DR in SNP patients is more challenging considering the poorer oral baseline conditions and cooperation during treatment. We provide an assessment of DR survival performed under (GA) in a cohort of uncooperative SNP over a 15-years period.
METHODS: Uncooperative SNP requiring dental treatments under GA in our institution during 2018 were collected. Patients who were treated with multiple GA sessions were selected to allow analysis of DR survival (DR performed between 2002-2017). Presence and clinical functionality of DR was assessed during subsequent follow-up visits or GA interventions. DR were considered successful since they were associated with an event (replacement, tooth loss, endodontic treatment). Median survival time (MST) of DR and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were retrieved with Kaplan Meier estimator. Random effect model assessed inter-patient variability.
RESULTS: Survival of 232 dental restorations in 59 patients was assessed. MST was 9 years (IC 8-10) Most relevant steps in survival analysis were seen after 2 and 11 years from last procedure. No considerable variability was observed in our population.
CONCLUSIONS: MST of dental restorations performed under GA our cohort resemble previous findings regarding routine conservative treatment in the general population. Lack of variability in our analysis suggest that MST seems not influenced by individual characteristics of patients. Our findings support tooth restoration as a reliable treatment modality in SNP treated under GA in accordance with available literature.


KEY WORDS: Dental care; Anesthesia; Intellectual disability; Permanent dental restoration

top of page